The good: Attractive and well-designed; capable
of producing very nice photos; complete set of manual controls; solid 720p
video.
The bad: On the slow side, with subpar battery
life; no low-compression JPEG option.
The bottom line: Though we'd like it to perform
better, dSLR shooters looking for a sidekick camera will find the Canon
PowerShot S95's top-flight photos and a full manual feature set worth the
tradeoff of its compact size.
When Canon shipped
its PowerShot S90 about a year ago, it made a big impression on advanced
photographers. Tiny with a wide-aperture lens and all the essential manual
shooting features, it was practically irresistible for dSLR luggers. It did
have a few flaws, however, some of which Canon has attempted to address with
the successor, the S95. These include a 720p video-capture upgrade, improved
image stabilization, and some minor tweaks to the design and feature set.
Performance, though, remains on the slow end of acceptable.
The image quality is
top-notch for a compact, although it's a shame that Canon doesn't offer a
less-compressed JPEG option. One of my photos shot in best-quality JPEG was
about 7:1, but most of them come in at about 12:1 compression. There's a
visible difference between raw and JPEG shots.
That said, the S95's
JPEG photos are exceptionally clean and relatively usable up to ISO 400; plus,
you can probably squeeze out a stop more if you shoot raw. That's a lot better
than your typical ultracompact. The lens is sharp and bright, but there's some
asymmetrical distortion at its widest. Metering and exposure are both good and
consistent. The defaults pushed the color saturation excessively,
though our quantitative test results report that the S95 has relatively
accurate color; the neutral color setting is not available in raw+JPEG
shooting. The colors are similarly overwrought in videos, but overall the movie
quality is pretty good, and despite being tiny, the stereo mics produce a
surprisingly full-bodied sound for a compact.
The S95's
performance improves over the S90's in some respects; unfortunately, it falls
behind it in others. With a time of 2 seconds, it takes about 0.2 longer to
power on and shoot. It's about 0.1 second faster at focusing and shooting in
bright light, but the same duration slower in dim: 0.4 and 0.7 second,
respectively.
For two sequential JPEG and flash shots, it's slower by at least 0.5 second, running 2.3 seconds for JPEG and 3.3 seconds for flash, compared with 1.8 and 2.5 seconds for the S90. That's flipped for raw shooting, however, with the S95 clocking at 2.6 seconds shot-to-shot vs. 3.4 seconds for the S90. Burst shooting rises to 1.9 frames per second, but at low speeds like that it's immaterial. Aside from the one exception of daylight shooting, the S95 feels like it operates at a leisurely but not overly frustrating pace. The image stabilization works well, but the fact remains that the battery life is pretty short.
For two sequential JPEG and flash shots, it's slower by at least 0.5 second, running 2.3 seconds for JPEG and 3.3 seconds for flash, compared with 1.8 and 2.5 seconds for the S90. That's flipped for raw shooting, however, with the S95 clocking at 2.6 seconds shot-to-shot vs. 3.4 seconds for the S90. Burst shooting rises to 1.9 frames per second, but at low speeds like that it's immaterial. Aside from the one exception of daylight shooting, the S95 feels like it operates at a leisurely but not overly frustrating pace. The image stabilization works well, but the fact remains that the battery life is pretty short.
The
S95 just has a body that feels nice. It's well built, with a slightly more
textured finish than the S90. It's the smallest and lightest among its class,
but as a tradeoff it's also the only model that lacks a hot shoe and the option
for a viewfinder. Though it was nice to review a camera that fit comfortably in
my front pocket for a change, it might feel a bit too small for some
photographers. You should definitely try before you buy to ensure you don't
need to move up to a slightly larger model like the G12, LX5, or TL500. Small
can be great on ultracompacts where you're not trying to change the settings
too often, but there's no point buying the S95 to run in complete auto.
The front ring can
be set to control shutter speed, ISO sensitivity, exposure compensation, manual
focus, white balance, stepped zoom, i-Contrast, or aspect ratio. The functions
can be set independently of shooting mode, so that, for example, it can control
focus in Manual mode or shutter speed while in aperture-priority mode.
On top of the camera
is a mode dial for access to the typical manual controls and scene modes. Plus
there's the ability to save a group of custom settings for quick mode-dial
access
The back controls
remain basically unchanged from the S90, although the dial, which you use for
adjusting contextual settings, operates better and isn't quite as free-spinning
as the previous model. The Func/Set button pulls up
adjustable shooting parameters, including ISO, white balance, color, bracketing
(exposure or focus), drive mode (single, continuous, continuous with
autofocus), metering, aspect ratio, quality, and dynamic range correction.
One not-so-pleasant
holdover from the S90 is the inconvenient flash placement. Although it makes
sense from a red-eye prevention perspective, most people hold their fingers
right where the flash pops up.
Though the camera
isn't big on whizzy features, it does incorporate a now-common HDR mode, which
automatically brackets and combines three exposures. For more details on the
scene modes and special effects, read the review of the S90 or download the PDF
of the S95's manual.
You'll still have to
schlep your dSLR to photograph kids, pets, wildlife, and anything else that
moves quickly or randomly, but the Canon PowerShot S95 is probably the best--if
expensive--alternative that an advanced shooter will find in such a small package.
0 comments:
Post a Comment